Why Don't We Have Nuclear Fusion Power Yet?

  • Publikuar 16 ditë më parë

    SciShowSciShow

    Kohëzgjatje: 10:56

    Thanks to LastPass for sponsoring this video. Check out LastPass here: bit.ly/2GbcEci
    Fusion power is supposed to save us from fossil fuels, so when is nuclear fusion going to be a viable option and why has it been so elusive?
    Hosted by: Stefan Chin
    SciShow has a spinoff podcast! It's called SciShow Tangents. Check it out at www.scishowtangents.org
    ----------
    Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: www.patreon.com/scishow
    ----------
    Dooblydoo thanks go to the following Patreon supporters: Greg, Alex Schuerch, Alex Hackman, Andrew Finley Brenan, Sam Lutfi, D.A. Noe, الخليفي سلطان, Piya Shedden, KatieMarie Magnone, Scott Satovsky Jr, Charles Southerland, Patrick D. Ashmore, charles george, Kevin Bealer, Chris Peters
    ----------
    Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
    Facebook: facebook.com/scishow
    Twitter: twitter.com/scishow
    Tumblr: scishow.tumblr.com
    Instagram: instagram.com/thescishow
    ----------
    Sources:
    www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-long-will-global-uranium-deposits-last/
    www.teslarati.com/porsche-ceo-hints-taycan-initial-production-911-hybrid/
    www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-27138087
    www.scientificamerican.com/article/experts-urge-u-s-to-continue-support-for-nuclear-fusion-research/
    www.businessinsider.com/china-east-experimental-advanced-superconducting-tokamak-nuclear-fusion-reactor-100-million-degrees-2018-12?r=US&IR=T
    www.theengineer.co.uk/first-light-fusion-debut-test/
    www.theengineer.co.uk/tokamak-energy-15-million-fusion/
    www3.nd.edu/~nsl/Lectures/phys20061/pdf/10.pdf
    nuclearweaponarchive.org/Library/Teller.html
    science.howstuffworks.com/nuclear-waste-disposal.htm
    www.iter.org/newsline/-/2845
    fire.pppl.gov/NIF_NIC_rev6_Koonin_2012.pdf
    large.stanford.edu/courses/2015/ph241/baumer1/
    e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/550771.pdf
    www.iter.org/fr/newsline/-/3121
    www.iter.org/doc/www/content/com/Lists/ITER%20Technical%20Reports/Attachments/9/ITER-Research-Plan_final_ITR_FINAL-Cover_High-Res.pdf
    physics.stackexchange.com/questions/175830/nuclear-fusion-scaling-with-reactor-size

    ITER:
    www.iter.org/sci/whatisfusion
    www.iter.org/sci/plasmaheating
    www.iter.org/sci/Fusion
    www.iter.org/sci/Goals
    NIF:
    lasers.llnl.gov/science/energy-for-the-future
    lasers.llnl.gov/science/ignition/ignition-experiments
    lasers.llnl.gov/news/experimental-highlights/2015/may

    SciShow  science  Hank  Green  education  learn  password manager  recover  random password generator  generate password  lastpass  fusion  future  energy  power  nuclear  laser  alternative  fission  plasma  alpha heating  ignition  icf  mcf  tokamak  tritium  turbulent  iter  jet  east  magnetic  neutron  neucleus  explosion  implosion  

Lajos György Mészáros
Lajos György Mészáros

Why use LastPass, when we have KeePassX?

6 orë më parë
Alijah Murphy
Alijah Murphy

Have you ever started a fire in a cold environment? It's not quite like you explained.

13 orë më parë
Alex Besogonov
Alex Besogonov

Research fusion reactors typically use plain hydrogen plasma (that doesn't fuse at all) for experiments to avoid regulatory difficulties. The results can then be extrapolated to D-T plasma. And the current experiments are also more specific, they focus on particular nuances of plasma behavior.

18 orë më parë
METO U
METO U

Because the sun is electric and not gravitational...gravity is magnetism...the reason why you can see a star behind the Sun during an eclipse is not because of space being warped...but because the light from the star behind the Sun gets repelled around the Sun because light repels light and 2 separate photons can not occupy the same space..Big Bang only explains 4 % of the universe and the rest is dark matter and dark energy or another words... I don't know...the electric universe theory explains the unknowns of the Big Bang Theory... Just don't believe the religious crap the electric universe proponents tie to the electric universe... Same exact people are on both sides of the argument

19 orë më parë
mike magic
mike magic

Enough Climate Change....We need Climate Constant!

Ditë më parë
Cesar Zayas
Cesar Zayas

"It wont be that way for long" well ya in ten years it wont be 30 years from now itll be 20..

Ditë më parë
Eva Paz
Eva Paz

Black holes are measurable. Black holes are created as stars implode. The star no longer emits energy, it sinks energy. What if the energy coming out of the sun is the energy being sunk into black holes somewhere else? All the funding would have been wasted. All the experts would be relying in a lie from another expert to get their full perspective. (As Christians, or funded by christians, do.)

Ditë më parë
Eva Paz
Eva Paz

Remember electromagnetic waves propagate even if there is no matter.

Ditë më parë
Eva Paz
Eva Paz

Has anyone ever physically proved that the energy being emitted by the sun is actually energy extracted from fusion of the elements in the sun? Has anyone ever physically proved where is the energy sunk by black holes going?

Ditë më parë
Sean Carlisle
Sean Carlisle

i don't know about you but i've been powered by NF for a while https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efZ-8EbFWic

Ditë më parë
Wiz Bud
Wiz Bud

Power storage improvement will do more to stop pollution that any new power source. Storage is the key.

Ditë më parë
Drake Kay
Drake Kay

Because Financiers demand that Scientists predict their discovers, literally violating the process of science replacing it with the process of money.

Ditë më parë
Supyloco
Supyloco

#FundNuclearFusion

Ditë më parë
Shane
Shane

That 1 second hair cut at 9:49

2 ditë më parë
Aj Blazed
Aj Blazed

this is cause they want to find a way to weaponize it as they did with nuclear …………a more powerful and cleaner source of power has excisted since the 50's

2 ditë më parë
Arda Karaduman
Arda Karaduman

turbines ? all this work and we still cant find a way to get electricity more efficiently ?

2 ditë më parë
I'm Only A Man And I Will Die Some Day
I'm Only A Man And I Will Die Some Day

The benchmark is producing energy at a cost that's equal or less than the current sources of energy. If you're spending billions to produce a few MW of energy, when you can spend millions to produce GW of energy, then fusion isn't worth it. I'm sure that one day we'll get there, but maybe in another 30 years ;p

2 ditë më parë
I'm Only A Man And I Will Die Some Day
I'm Only A Man And I Will Die Some Day

In the meantime, Thorium nuclear energy: https://youtu.be/k6BXvw6mxtw

2 ditë më parë
Nini Zeldav
Nini Zeldav

So many experts in the comment section.

2 ditë më parë
Smart Vibes
Smart Vibes

Ummm, did this guy use "likelier" instead of "more likely". I'm gonna use that as my password, and by the way. Why wasn't he using grammarly, I bet he was and it just fkd him over..... fkn grammarly

2 ditë më parë
Ruben Santos
Ruben Santos

so many chair engineers around here xD

2 ditë më parë
Milligram
Milligram

It's not true that the benchmark of whether fusion is practical is when you have more energy out than it takes to run - it's when you get more money out than it takes to run.

2 ditë më parë
Hans Carlos Hofmann
Hans Carlos Hofmann

Fusion produces also radioactive Waste ... but the alf life time is quite lower

3 ditë më parë
Tamahagane
Tamahagane

In about 100 years we look at this video and go HAHA did we really needed to have such a big fusion reactor to gain such a luttle amount of power? or something like "dad didnt they really have fusion cars?

3 ditë më parë
The Ceij
The Ceij

Stars don't work like we think we know they do.

3 ditë më parë
Erik Hare
Erik Hare

With all of the progress, I think we can say that fusion is now ten years away - and always will be.

3 ditë më parë
Sauron glasses
Sauron glasses

and i live Wright next to ITER so is it saff!!!!

3 ditë më parë
GeterPoldstein
GeterPoldstein

My hopes are pinned on the stellerator tocamac. Wendelstein 7-X has been posting some really nice plasma confinement results in the past few years.

3 ditë më parë
jfedgar
jfedgar

Disappointed you didn't mention SPARC and the promise that the newer, more powerful superconductors hold.

3 ditë më parë
Letruffier
Letruffier

Who said that you need extreme temperatures to reach fusion? What about Brioullin energy and other LENR concepts? There are even ambiant temperatures fusion occurring in ass of chickens :) Concepts presented in the video are so primitive and inefficient. I am considering LENR less fringe than hot reactors and if you want to remain immediately realistic do thorium which have been abandoned because of the military motherfuckers.

3 ditë më parë
Mayday
Mayday

why nowbody talk's about proton+boron aneutronic laser fusion? No neutrons, no long-term radiactive waste and much smaller devices This is a much more exciting way for fusion. https://www.nature.com/news/two-laser-boron-fusion-lights-the-way-to-radiation-free-energy-1.13914

3 ditë më parë
dadrumer
dadrumer

Why isn‘t there any talk about the stellarator? There is a german research facility making good progress in the field.

3 ditë më parë
Atomicskull
Atomicskull

Thermonuclear bombs are still mostly atomic bombs. They use the second fusion stage to generate neutrons which causes fast fission (i.e. more complete fission that otherwise possible) in a third fission stage. Most of the energy released by a thermonuclear bomb is from fission. The exception is the Tsar Bomba which had it's third uranium stage removed at the last minute. As originally designed it was supposed to be 100 megatons but even the soviets got nervous about that.

3 ditë më parë
Mr Cabot
Mr Cabot

Lets say for arguments sake, that these experiments, over decades, have cost in the order of some trillions of dollars, minimum. Where would the human race be today if we had spent that money just on solar and wind? We would have a global solar economy, that's what. We hear talk of problems storing energy but if you were a Roan over 1000 years ago, they would not have even thought twice. Solar farms can pump water by day and the water can flow through generators 24-7, simple hydro power. Add to that possibilities with proven geothermal and we already have a range of effective wind turbines, although far too few horizontal micro turbines suitable for homes and businesses. Electricity is critical to a clean future and the solutions need to be foolproof and have longevity few engineers bother planning for these days.

3 ditë më parë
KohuGaly
KohuGaly

If we spend all that money on solar and wind we would have an unstable power grid that relies on overpriced gasoline and coal to throttle the supply and keep it from collapsing. Sure, carbon emissions might be lower overall, but at the same time, they are floored with absolutely no viable alternatives to reduce them to zero, in at least a century to come. With all the money in RnD of nuclear fusion we have a reasonable hope to start switching to 100% green power grid within our lifetimes.

3 ditë më parë
subvet657
subvet657

you lost me at man made global warming. he's a tip.....nuclear fission power generation is greenhouse gas free and something we can do NOW. don't like it? too bad. it's the best thing to use to get to something better. and you didn't even mention MSR's which is a nuclear reactor you could have in your back yard.

3 ditë më parë
Trippy Bruh
Trippy Bruh

We need more nuclear power plants! Just don't build them on the coast or near a fault line.

3 ditë më parë
Pyronious520
Pyronious520

Last Pass is wondeful! Also holy cow i really hoped we were closer to fusion.

3 ditë më parë
mrspeigle1
mrspeigle1

Dirty secret, iter is already outdated, recent advances in magnetic field generation have rendered the design obsolescent. Keep an eye on a project out of MIT called Spark.

3 ditë më parë
QuantumRift
QuantumRift

Try controlling a FUSION reaction. DUH.

4 ditë më parë
Gabriel Grigore
Gabriel Grigore

I only people werent so unrationally scared of nuclear

4 ditë më parë
Milos Stojanovic
Milos Stojanovic

I think that we are 100+ years away from useful(usable) fusion, maybe even 200+ years. Oh if i could only fast travel in future to see where we would be.

4 ditë më parë
Fraser McFadyen
Fraser McFadyen

Fusion power is just 8 minutes away.

4 ditë më parë
Scott Velez
Scott  Velez

Why don't we get Shaggy to offer some of his power.

4 ditë më parë
Danielle Wilson
Danielle Wilson

I misread fusion as poison in the title

4 ditë më parë
Mondranux Anvilux
Mondranux Anvilux

Good job for ignoring the existence of biofuels

4 ditë më parë
Jacob Collins
Jacob Collins

We're not going to run out of nuclear fission fuels sources for thousands of years... So good one 😉

4 ditë më parë
Soulkeeper
Soulkeeper

co 2 is good the other pollution not talkt about C02 is air for plants make them grow larger, better, more fruit, more, co2 to h20 conversion, making the ground fertile we add extra co2 to grow house, to get a hie yield this is why we want no Fusion power, we need More Co2 giving plants the time evolve to eat plastics

4 ditë më parë
Melinda Green
Melinda Green

If we had essentially unlimited cheap energy, we would find new ways to use it extravagantly until we drive global warming directly from all the waste heat at end end of all uses of energy. Let's not fall in love with fusion like we did with fission. The Earth must live within its heat budget, and the only way to do that is through renewables which don't create a positive net energy difference in the biosphere.

4 ditë më parë
Nathan Frey
Nathan Frey

America is actually an excellent energy producer. What is this guy talking about? Moreover, we pollute far less per capita than the majority of developed countries. We’re good..we’re damn good. The question is how can we be even better and lead the world on yet another front?

4 ditë më parë
wmopp
wmopp

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/en.atm.co2e.pc?year_high_desc=true

3 ditë më parë
Rob Karmic
Rob Karmic

Have you tried turning it off and on again? I hear that duplication glitch is pretty effective.

5 ditë më parë
Rob Karmic
Rob Karmic

My biggest question is why people are so scared of nuclear fusion? Nuclear Fusion is clearly a great idea.

5 ditë më parë
Rob Karmic
Rob Karmic

Most importantly, always consider the fact that you need all the information. Sometimes you need information, simply to know you don't have all of it. If you don't think you're wrong, then try throwing out some of your more favorable techniques that relied on sloppy functions when you swap them both out for a new technique entirely. Maybe one combination doesn't pick the lock, but an inverted step will?

5 ditë më parë
Rob Karmic
Rob Karmic

Can you use all three at once, with partial compensation as a stepping stone for the full process? In other words, use maximum effort. Also, try skipping the next step, and assuming you did it. Usually that breaks things, but it may be more efficient to work around a problem AREA, as opposed to fixing the acute problem.

5 ditë më parë
Rob Karmic
Rob Karmic

Maybe you could try and get it to suddenly collapse all at once? Probably dangerous, but it would give it a sort of short range momentum kick, right?

5 ditë më parë
TeoTull
TeoTull

@scishow how come you do not mention the Stellarator as an alternative to the Tokamak for MCF, especially given the interesting and promising results that came out of the Wendelstein 7-X in 2018?

5 ditë më parë
TIBOR Purzsas
TIBOR Purzsas

You got a funy nose!

5 ditë më parë
Shade
Shade

9:48 that was a quick haircut

5 ditë më parë
Stephen Goodfellow
Stephen Goodfellow

The reason we have not achieved controlled nuclear fusion, is because the research is carried out by nuclear physicists. These are hobbled by an insular communal group-think that stifles any meaningful possibility of achieving a breakthrough. So controlled nuclear fusion? Don't hold your breath.

5 ditë më parë
Emily Rowland-Rawson
Emily Rowland-Rawson

6:11 that voice crack

5 ditë më parë
Xurre
Xurre

Nucular, it's spelled nucular

5 ditë më parë
Conservative Minuteman
Conservative Minuteman

What ever happened to Cold Fusion?

6 ditë më parë
hardware4200
hardware4200

How about considering Thorium and Molten Salt Reactors? Thorium is everywhere.

6 ditë më parë
trik
trik

stop telling wind power is inconsistent. 99% of wind miles is turned off because is to much electricity in grid not because no wind. 30m above ground is constant wind

6 ditë më parë
JK 06667
JK 06667

The NIF approach seems like a dead end. How do you capture the produced energy? In practical engineering terms it seems a waste of time and resources

6 ditë më parë
Andy Davies
Andy Davies

You collect energy the same way MCF does. It heats up the chamber walls.

5 ditë më parë
Drizzt
Drizzt

So we are still 30yrs away from having it.

6 ditë më parë
dinoxtra
dinoxtra

Safety measures? None, please build supernova and crack this planet in two parts, we had enough

6 ditë më parë
GANTZ100pts
GANTZ100pts

Don't worry it's just ten years away. 😅

6 ditë më parë
Manny Nanez
Manny Nanez

Sci show has some competition in the comment section XP

7 ditë më parë
TheOv3rlordK1ng
TheOv3rlordK1ng

Dumb ass

7 ditë më parë
TheOv3rlordK1ng
TheOv3rlordK1ng

Oh god is this another google reading

7 ditë më parë
Gabriel M.
Gabriel M.

bye mr green

7 ditë më parë
Bjørnar Iversen
Bjørnar Iversen

Three lies within 30sec.. that must be a new record!

7 ditë më parë
rosselur
rosselur

"it's still at least 30 years away. but maybe it won't be for long." that did not make sense to me.

7 ditë më parë
Henry Woodward
Henry Woodward

Thank you. Because of this video, for the first time, I’m starting to understand all the problems with fusion. I knew it had to be serious issues but I couldn’t understand the inherent problems. Now I’m beginning to understand.

7 ditë më parë
Nic Hunter
Nic Hunter

God damnit!! Where is Hank? I won't watch these unless it's Hank. He is actually entertaining.

7 ditë më parë
TheRumpus
TheRumpus

Any script which includes the lines "a bunch of energy" as occurs about the the 2:45 mark, suggests the author has no idea what they are talking about. So I stopped watching there. Why is it that the non-regular presenters seem to have dumb-downed scripts? Presumably they have some input on the script.

7 ditë më parë
JS Wong
JS Wong

Starts of by saying fusion doesn't produce any radioactive waste or by-product, unlike nuclear fission. Ends up stating correctly, 7 minutes later, that neutrons released from fusion turns the reactor vessel itself highly radioactive. The vessel itself becomes the "radioactive waste". Unlike the fission products and "unburned" mixed oxide fuel elements in nuclear fission reactors, which can be reprocessed to new fuel (in the case of the "unburned" fuel) or diverted for beneficial use e.g. industrial materials and radiomedicine (for the fission products), or even consumed in another type of reactor (heavy isotopes produced in thermal spectrum reactors can be fissioned in fast spectrum reactors), there's pretty much nothing you can do with the radioactive reactor vessel of a fusion reactor. Besides letting it stick around, buried somewhere, irradiating the surroundings for thousands of years.

7 ditë më parë
Chris Ashby
Chris Ashby

turbulent juice

7 ditë më parë
C.C. Rider
C.C. Rider

ok i'll be the first to admit, i'm pretty much dumb as dirt, but HOW is solar and wind energy harmful to the ecosystem?

7 ditë më parë
Sean Haggard
Sean Haggard

The real question is why isn't our grid powered 100 % by fission plants. We have harnessed the power of sun. We should use it.

7 ditë më parë
Trevor Johnson
Trevor Johnson

Hi there. Has current theory goes to get a finite amount of fusion energy in this day and age, we expend more energy then we received, as for it's always 30 years away, most physicists theorise you can take that to the bank. It's containing the little amounts that are generated even for a nanosecond.. What's that bloody thing called, the CERN super collider and they want to build a bigger one, they have produced other particles that have lasted longer. Whoop de doo. G . A small God. Goofus. Allegedly.

8 ditë më parë
Charlie Lund
Charlie Lund

"We don't want radioactive waste hanging out on the planet for thousands of years, threatening peoples lives." Sigh... Nuclear Waste doesn't hurt anyone, and probably never will. It can sit in an underground repository until the end of time. Also the better fission reactors we get, the less time the waste needs to decay to background. A liquid fueled fast reactor will consume all the transuranics leaving only fission products as waste, and those decay relatively quickly. Don't be afraid of long lived waste, Uranium 238 has a 4.4 x 10^9 year half life, but that means it is very very weak at emitting radiation. Short half life = dangerous for short amount of time. Long half life = not dangerous at all for a very long time. Don't be spooked by long half lifes.

8 ditë më parë
Snoov747
Snoov747

haha charged gas

8 ditë më parë
Simmi_
Simmi_

Would this mean that a fission reactor would be a perpetual motion engine? I thought it was impossible to create energy, we can only change it's type? They said in the video they hope to get more energy out then they put in. Surely if we cannot create energy this isn't possible? Am I being dumb?

8 ditë më parë
Simmi_
Simmi_

Thank you, that was a very good explination. +Noah McCann

7 ditë më parë
Noah McCann
Noah McCann

Simmi_ you are correct that you can only get back how much energy was put in. But it doesn’t have to be “you” who put the energy in. This is true with more conventional fuels like oil as well - it is essentially solar energy concentrated over long periods of time. We burn it and get that energy back over short periods of time. Nuclear energy (either fission or fusion) works in a similar way, the energy was put there during the creation of the universe and we are extracting it. The energy necessary to release energy isn’t always the same as the energy being released. Imagine you came upon a 1kg mass balanced atop a tall tower of blocks. That mass has gravitational potential energy. You could release that energy by simply tipping over the tower of blocks. Tipping the blocks likely won’t take as much energy as will be released from the 1kg mass because you don’t have to move the whole tower, you just need to move it enough that it becomes unstable and gravity handles the rest. Now, if you were the one who put the 1kg mass on top of the tower, there would be no net gain of energy (from your perspective), there may even be a net loss if you also had to set up the tower. But if someone else were to set up the tower and 1kg mass, then you would be gaining energy while they would have lost energy.

7 ditë më parë
Simmi_
Simmi_

+Noah McCann I did mean mean fusion, I was slightly drunk when writing that comment. I have a basic understanding of general relativity but Im struggling to grasp how putting energy into a machine will net a sustained gain in energy for a long period. Does this not go against the conservation of energy law? I'm meaning you can only ever get back what you put in.

7 ditë më parë
Noah McCann
Noah McCann

Simmi_ I assume you meant “fusion reactor” rather than “fission reactor”- but in either case there is no perpetual motion. As you said, energy must change from one form to another. In the case of nuclear reactions the energy comes from the mass of the input. If you measure the mass of the output, it is less than the input - the difference was converted into energy. This is due to the equivalence of mass and energy, as the (simplified) equation from Einstein shows: e=mc^2, where ‘e’ is energy, ‘m’ is mass, and ‘c’ is the speed of light. You can get a lot of energy from a small amount of mass. But you must first overcome the bonds that hold the nucleus together.

7 ditë më parë
William Johnson
William Johnson

Molten salt reactors using thorium are overlooked because is almost ready to go. The money spent on fast breeders should have been changing Thorium232 to Uradium233 instead of changing U radium238 into Plutonium239.

8 ditë më parë
Stefan Schleps
Stefan Schleps

Like everything else our all-knowing scientists have done over the last hundred years. Fusion power seems environmentally sound. Until there is a breach of some kind within a *Tokamak. And we end up with a runaway fusion reaction spilling gigantic amount of highly radioactive material into the atmosphere for thirty or a hundred thousand years. Or until some genius just has to prove himself by developing a fusion bomb. And like the Castle Bravo test miscalculates the yield and the Earth ends up being fried and humanity ends up extinct. Another thirty years....*( but yeah, the magnetic field seems like a step forward.) Peace.

8 ditë më parë
Stefan Schleps
Stefan Schleps

+Noah McCann Yeah, you're right.

7 ditë më parë
Noah McCann
Noah McCann

Stefan Schleps fusion reactions cannot enter a runaway state largely due to the high temperatures needed to sustain them. While you are likely correct that this technology will have environmental impacts we have not fully considered, I think that is a very poor reason to avoid its study. Particularly given the known environmental impacts of our existing energy production methods. Also, to avoid something because “humanity ends up extinct” is pointless - humanity ends up extinct no matter what we do. Either it actually becomes extinct, or it morphs into something that cannot reasonably be called human in our modern sense. Neither are good reasons to let our technology stagnate.

7 ditë më parë
WOLTROX
WOLTROX

Simple Nuclear Power is a Hoax😂

8 ditë më parë
Jack
Jack

Unless Hank Green is hosting, I don't watch the video.

8 ditë më parë
Wei Zhao
Wei Zhao

I want what I want

6 ditë më parë
Dennis Gillanders
Dennis Gillanders

Amateur leftist double talk

8 ditë më parë
Wei Zhao
Wei Zhao

pish posh

6 ditë më parë
SciFi Factory
SciFi Factory

This video feels like it was made 8 years ago ... there are so many new fusion projects.

8 ditë më parë
Per Norrström
Per Norrström

Fusion does releas radioactive waste but not so mutch and it only stays radioactive for 100 years compared to 100 000

8 ditë më parë
Blue Steel
Blue Steel

Sorry, distracting hand gestures. Couldn't finish.

8 ditë më parë
Wei Zhao
Wei Zhao

tries to conglomerate all masculinity issues without fixing the cause

6 ditë më parë
Josh Wanuck
Josh Wanuck

Once we figure out fusion can’t we just split the atoms and then combine the atoms together again and over and over

8 ditë më parë
Noah McCann
Noah McCann

Josh Wanuck this is not possible, because when the atoms are split some of there mass is converted into energy. It is this energy which is collected by the reactor. One way to think of this is like cutting a chocolate bar - every time you make a cut, a small amount of the chocolate is being lost as small flakes of chocolate or chocolate dust. If you cut the chocolate 10 times and then put the (large) pieces back together, they wouldn’t have the same weight as the original bar. Note that this isn’t a perfect example - because you could collect all of the small chocolate shavings and restore the original weight. In the case of fusion/fission what you’ve converted to energy cannot be easily converted back to mass - and even if it could, that wouldn’t get you any usable energy because the energy you could have used was instead put back into the reactor.

7 ditë më parë
Joe Eoj
Joe Eoj

we don't have fusion cause scientists are stupid................

8 ditë më parë
tyler a
tyler a

the new reactor in France just seems like a larger JET remix. The remix to ignition.

9 ditë më parë
JesseMoshe
JesseMoshe

I wonder whether there is a way that the particle effects from nuclear fission can be harnessed to assist in sustaining a fusion reaction.

9 ditë më parë
Phone User
Phone User

Man made climate change is a scam.

9 ditë më parë
Wei Zhao
Wei Zhao

if it all fits like clockwork then why did the guy screw it up in the first place.

6 ditë më parë
nhzxboi
nhzxboi

Slow down! Allow some time for contemplation!

9 ditë më parë
Wei Zhao
Wei Zhao

triple reverse psychology won't change my mind

6 ditë më parë
Axel Kusanagi
Axel Kusanagi

UGH! Just use Thorium MSRs until then! It's as plentiful as lead and uses 99% of the energy in its bonds, can be bred with radioactive waste to render it inert, and it's walk-away safe and makes no waste of its own. Seriously, why hasn't the science community put all its weight behind this technology before daydreaming about pie-in-the-sky crap that may never pan out? Because it's a stopgap? I just don't get it.

9 ditë më parë
Doom And Gloom
Doom And Gloom

What we need is a Thorium Molten Salt Reactor. Thorium is the future.

9 ditë më parë
Fun Trump-fact
Fun Trump-fact

Why Don't We Have Nuclear Fusion Power Yet? Good question, SciShow, but don't ask me. Watch your own video to find out. A better title would have been *'This Is Why We Don't Have Nuclear Fusion Power, Yet'.* You're welcome.

9 ditë më parë
Hand Solo
Hand Solo

Imagine you are a physicist and you pull off a fusion scam once from the government, you are set for the next 30 years.

9 ditë më parë
Hand Solo
Hand Solo

It's 30 years away from no longer 30 years away. Got it.

9 ditë më parë
Silver Wyvern
Silver Wyvern

They're gonna set the atmosphere on fire in 2035, just wait lmao

9 ditë më parë
Silver Wyvern
Silver Wyvern

#ThoriumEnergy is safer just costly to build, not to maintain however.

9 ditë më parë

Faqja Tjeter

5 of the World's Most Dangerous Chemicals

10:45

how midwesterners call their dogs

1:01

how midwesterners call their dogs

Gus Johnson

Shikime 1 119 626

Are Negative Ions Good For You?

16:31

Are Negative Ions Good For You?

Veritasium

Shikime 857 000

How do spacecraft navigate in space ?

16:58

How do spacecraft navigate in space ?

Curious Droid

Shikime 1 600 000

Why are the airplanes losing speed?

18:29

Why are the airplanes losing speed?

Skyships Eng

Shikime 695 000

Can We Terraform the Sahara to Stop Climate Change?

12:48

Marvel Studios' Captain Marvel | "Rise" TV Spot

0:46

Marvel Studios' Captain Marvel | "Rise" TV Spot

Marvel Entertainment

Shikime 1 635 757

Rocketman (2019) - Official Trailer - Paramount Pictures

2:33

Watch Samsung unveil the Galaxy Fold

10:58